The Guardian: “Several European countries have stopped using the Oxford / AstraZeneca Covid vaccine …”
The Guardian has a whole new definition of “more”. Their own article shows the following nations: Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Lithuania, Romania, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, the Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Slovenia, Cyprus, Sweden.
Bulgaria and Thailand have also stopped jab.
The reason for “pause?” A “small” number of people have developed blood clots.
And now, as I write this, Wall St. reports. Journal that medical regulators in the EU have decided that everything is in order – “the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks.” Standard hob language for: “we do not have to explain vaccine injuries or deaths.”
If you think only a few people with blood clots got 20 countries to stop giving jabs, I have condos on Mars for sale.
OLD behind the firewall from the vaccine company, MANY people fall over.
And why would they not? Governments and pharmaceutical companies have rushed a new experimental RNA technology into use for the first time in history. Prior to the COVID injection, all attempts to force evidence of RNA technology had failed; dangerous and fatal overreaction of the immune system was the cause.
Since I seem to be one of the only ones saying this, I say it again: Bill Gates, Fauci and other healthy vaccinators are in love with RNA technology. It makes it possible to produce vaccines much faster, easier and easier.
For any alleged virus, by the drop of a hat, companies can come up with a vaccine. It does not take four years. It takes three months.
“We just discovered a virus that crossed from geese. And here is a new one from the Easter bunny. And another new one just came in from Jupiter. We have vaccines ready for Christmas. The seventh mutation of SARS-CoV-2 has its own vaccine from yesterday. If you want to take the kids to Disneyland, find one of the beautiful pink vans parked in your city, take the shot and receive your updated certificate of immunity … ”
Then there is this: COVID vaccines manufactured by AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna are completely ineffective in preventing serious disease. OF DESIGN.
Months ago, a NY Times play by Peter Doshi and Eric Topol spelled it out.
September 22, 2020: “These Coronavirus tests do not answer the only question we need to know”:
“If you were to prove a coronavirus vaccine, would you prove one that you knew only protected people against the mildest form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?” [Clue: “most mild” means cough, or chills and fever, which cure themselves without the need for a vaccine.]
“The answer is obvious. You want to protect yourself from the worst cases. ”
“But it is not the case that the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose US trials are on hold, are heading for the problem.”
“According to the protocols of their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the corporate benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but it was never shown to reduce moderate or severe form of the disease. or the risk of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit or death. ”
“To say that a vaccine works should mean that most people are no longer at risk of becoming seriously ill. That is not what these trials will determine. ”
The COVID shot: dangerous AND ineffective.
Trump’s coronavirus task force knew the truth. Biden’s task force knows the truth. But they do not care.
The CDC and WHO know that. They do not care either.
But these authorities are very nervous because many people avoid the vaccine. It is not “hesitation”.
It is complete rejection.
It began shortly after the first rollout of the Pfizer vaccine. NBC News, December 31, 2020:
“A large percentage of frontline workers in hospitals and nursing homes have refused to take the Covid-19 vaccine …”
“About 50 percent of California’s Riverside County frontline workers have refused to take the vaccine …”
“Anecdotally, it is estimated that an estimated 60 percent of nursing home staff in Ohio have already denied the vaccine …”
“A survey of 2,053 New York City firefighters found that more than half said they would refuse the Covid-19 vaccine when it became available to them …”
And all this was long before 20 countries suspended the injection.
I close so far with two statements about the role that vaccines have played in eliminating deaths due to disease – because true history matters:
The combined mortality among scarlet fever, diphtheria, pertussis and measles among children up to fifteen shows that almost 90 percent of the total decrease in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had taken place before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession can be attributed to improved house and a decrease in the virulence of microorganisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host resistance due to better nutrition. Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977
Robert F Kennedy, jr.: “After extensive study of a century of recorded data, research centers for disease control and prevention and Johns Hopkins concluded: ‘Thus, vaccinations do not account for the impressive declines in infectious disease mortality seen in the first half of the twentieth century’. ”
Similarly, in 1977, Boston University epidemiologists (and husband and wife) John and Sonja McKinlay published their usual work in the Millbank Memorial Fund on a quarterly basis on the role that vaccines (and other medical interventions) played in the massive 74% mortality rate seen in the twentieth century: ‘The dubious contribution of medical intervention to the death in the United States in the twentieth century’. ”
“In this article, which previously required reading in American medical schools, McKinlays pointed out that 92.3% of mortality rates intensified between 1900 and 1950, before most vaccines existed, and that all medical measures, including antibiotics and surgeries, ‘bulb for having contributed little to the overall decline in mortality in the United States since about 1900 – in many cases being introduced several decades after a marked decline had already begun and without any demonstrable influence in most cases. ”