The NCAA’s efforts to allow athletes to make money from personal approval and sponsorship agreements are stuck, and June is a potentially busy and important month for college sports.
“My anniversary is June 24. And every year my wife and I take a vacation around June 24,” NCAA President Mark Emmert said Monday. “And we canceled the holiday.”
Just days before the start of the NCAA’s most lucrative and important men’s basketball tournament in Division I, Emmert spoke about what is happening with the association’s attempts to reform the rules regarding the name, image and form of compensation for athletes.
Despite the current chaos, Emmert said he still hopes the NCAA will have uniform national NIL rules in place before the start of next football season.
“We definitely want to make sure we’re ready to implement these kinds of rules before we fall.” There are a lot of moving parts and it is very difficult to get to the place, “said Emmert during a 30-minute interview.
These moving parts include more than 300 NCAA member schools, Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and dozens of state legislatures.
In January, the NCAA postponed the vote on membership of the NIL legislation after receiving a letter from the Department of Justice warning that the proposed changes to the rules could be contrary to antitrust law. Last week, the DOJ filed a stimulating notice in support of NCAA opponents in the antitrust case, which was due to be filed with the Supreme Court later this month.
“This is a relevant data point that will help us understand how we are moving forward with NIL,” said NCAA Chief Legal Officer Donald Remy, who interviewed Emmert.
The NCAA decides on the decision of a federal judge in the so-called Alston Case, which states that the association cannot claim compensation related to the education that schools provide to athletes. The decision did not include NIL compensation.
Remy said it was an NCAA self-government ability.
Involving the DOJ in a Supreme Court case reduces the likelihood that it will provide guidance to the NCAA, which could pave the way for the association to comfortably move forward with NIL reform before a decision is made.
“We look forward to trying to get (DOJ) to better understand our rules and to learn better about their concerns to find out what the way forward should be,” Remy said.
The Supreme Court usually issues decisions throughout June.
Meanwhile, the NCAA faces pressure from dozens of states that have accounts in work related to NIL compensation for college athletes. The Florida law is due to come into force on July 1, and Iowa is working quickly to pass a law that would do the same.
The NCAA is seeking congressional assistance in the form of a federal law that would prioritize state laws, prevent schools from competing under a variety of regulations, and provide protection for associations against future antitrust lawsuits.
In December alone, four bills were introduced in Congress, two from Republicans and two from Democrats. However, lawmakers in Washington have different priorities right now and are unlikely to move on to any of these bills until the Supreme Court considers it.
“I still believe that Congress is responsible for addressing the civil rights crisis at the heart of college sports,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Who introduced the NIL bill. “But where Congress is not acting, I think the courts and the Department of Justice can and should help end generations of exploitation by addressing the ways in which the NCAA illegally controls the compensation of college athletes.” While I personally think that federal legislation is necessary to put pressure on the NCAA to change its ways, a wait-and-see approach can also be an effective way to free up the sports industry’s Kabbalah. “
The January DOJ letter also triggered a pause in attempts by the NCAA to reform the transfer rules by easing restrictions on athletes in major sports. The NCAA wants to allow all athletes to transfer once as college students and be eligible to play immediately. Currently, NCAA rules require football, basketball, baseball, and hockey divisions to end their season after moving to another DI school.
Emmert said he hoped the NIL and transfer issues could be separated, allowing the NCAA to continue NIL legislation next month.
“It’s simpler and more straightforward (the problem),” Emmert said of the transfer rules. “And we believe … that everything we do is in full compliance with United States law.” That there is nothing inappropriate about it. And really, it’s something that has already happened. “
Follow Ralph D. Russo at https://twitter.com/ralphDrusso and listen at https://westwoodonepodcasts.com/pods/-top-25-college-football-podcast/